Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Some people argue that the amount of household waste being recycled is inadequate and that recycling should be of citizen legal responsibility. From my perspective, I totally support this idea in terms of its environmental and economic benefits.
First of all, considering the environmental aspect, legal requirements forcing people to recycle would be a huge contribution to ecosystem protection. It is widely known that the uncontrolled waste disposal has been causing great damage to the environment. Campaigns promoting recycling to save nature have been constantly conducted yet not effectively. This is possibly because inhabitants are not fined for dumping garbage illegally, thus, they are not scared of the consequence. Therefore, tougher measure by the government must be taken so that people will not dispose of waste insensibly and recycle more.
Secondly, regarding the economic facet, laws for recycling will help save a gigantic amount of state budget spent on waste disposal every year. It should be noted that the public’s refusal to recycle results in their spending more to buy new stuff. In this case, governmental regulations would be of great help for both sides. Specifically, compulsory recycling would make citizens more conscious before littering and resort to reusing things if they aspire to reduce their spending.
In conclusion, laws should be made in order to raise people awareness on the significance of recycling and give them more motivation to convert usage of old belongings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 56
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 61
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 530, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the revenue for landfill improvements or In conclusion, recycling should be featu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41153846154 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92150514422 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638461538462 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0386686575 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234160169782 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839819402781 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621511715051 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11604529648 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603470269092 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.