since traveling abroad became relatively inexpensive more countries opened their doors for foreign tourists. is it a positive or negative trend? give your opinion and include relevant examples
Nowadays, in this competitive world, tourist attraction is one of the most prominent and beneficial ways to increase countries` income undoubtedly. Hence, governments try to devise some appropriate plans to facilitating tourists traveling to their countries. In this attitude, more countries opened their doors for foreign tourists after decreasing the price of traveling to other countries. I will discussed about advantages and disadvantages of this tendency and in follow, I will describe my opinion.
One of the most important indicators for people to travel as a tourist is convenience of traveling to other countries. Many countries try to diminish their strictly rules for foreign tourists because of several beneficial results of that. Lots of commercial experts are unanimous in profits of tourist traveling for host countries. They argue that without any hesitation tourism is one of the easiest ways to increase income for countries. As evidence, recent published reports in Turkey illustrated that three tenth of their income comes from the tourism industry. Consequently, they try to distribute this industry by expanding facilities and constructing fundamental requirements. Furthermore, according to United Nations report, tourism is the best way to distribute cultural and commercial communications between countries.
On the other hand, some social researchers claim that this approach have several significant issues for host countries. In their opinion, first of all, host countries are very busy and crowded most of the times and it make people unsatisfied and uneasy. Secondly, by increasing the number of tourists from undeveloped countries to modern world because of low price of traveling, some people from developed host countries insist that majority of tourists have demand to stay in their country as an immigrant and it can be perilous for their culture and economy undoubtedly.
In conclusion, by comparing both sides of this argument it is obvious that because of financial profits of this tendency governments are resolute to pursue this method. I believe that tourism distribution in countries as one of the best way for increasing income and communication is unavoidable but countries should increase their safety to avoiding from any unforeseen risks in their countries.
- People say that it is impossible for women to be an effective women and to be a good mother in home at the same time.They also suggest that the government should give the salary to mothers who stay at home to take care of their children. 73
- Some people believe that manufacturersand supermarkets should minimise thepackaging material used. However, othersthink that consumers should avoidheavily packaged goods. Discuss bothviews and give your opinion. 78
- In some countries it is illegal for employers to reject job applications on the basis of age criteria. Is it a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. 56
- Nowadays, distance-learning programs are commonplace, but some people argue that they are not as good as those attending in a college or university in person. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produced electricity. 67
Comments
Please inform me about my
Please inform me about my considerable mistakes in this essay. I believe that my score is more than 6.5 in this writing
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'discuss'
Suggestion: discuss
...of traveling to other countries. I will discussed about advantages and disadvantages of t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...sy and crowded most of the times and it make people unsatisfied and uneasy. Secondly...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60398860399 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10121255936 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501424501425 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4259818469 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.9375 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170799482572 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664494097851 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652610388446 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117950093358 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330876559629 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.