Given is a bar chart comparing the scores of 3 teams including team A, B and C over the period of 3 years since 2002.
In general, it is evident that while the data on team A increased, both the figure for team B and team C was a reverse trend. Besides, the socres of team B was the highest compared to the other 2 teams.
Concerning team A, at the beginning at the period, aforementioned team had 5 point in their score before rising to 11 point until 2002. In the next year, there was a quick growth to 35% but team A witnessed a dramatic decrease of 23% at the end of the period.
Regarding team B, in the first year, the figure was highest, at 82 point. But after 2 years, there was a dramatic deline to 43%, which was half of the scores of it at the beginnng. For the rest of the period, the scores of team B went up steadily to 55%.
In term of team C, there was a slight rise from 10 point to 15 point in 2002 and 2003, respectively. Team B exprienced a downward trend to 5 ponit in their score until 2005.
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 11
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 11
- The bar chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 11
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease of 23% at the end of the period. Regarding team B, in the first year, the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, regarding, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.05418719212 4.92477711251 82% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3706714221 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.4989361461 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.3 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136317121224 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675845956641 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383259054695 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956270709242 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384402594057 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 93.48 61.2550243902 153% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.21 11.4140731707 54% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.