The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.
The bar chart compares what kinds of post-school qualifications people in Australia could acquire and how many males and females held them in 1999. Overall, it is clear from the chart that there was a disparity in different genders obtaining five various post-school qualifications in Australia and the largest gap was in skilled vocational diploma.
Starting with skilled vocational diploma, postgraduate diploma and master’s degree, there were more men than women. The largest difference can be seen in the lower diploma where there were 90% males but only 10% females. In the higher diploma, the number of men was more than twice larger than that of women, 70% versus 30%. In the master’s degree, the gap was the smallest (60% against 40%).
Turning now to undergraduate diploma and bachelor’s degree, women outnumbered men, but the gap was less noticeable. 65% women received undergraduate diploma while 35% men did so. Compared with 45% males, 55% females obtained bachelor’s degree.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- Now children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time doing sports. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 84
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39873417722 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05481225351 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5210789841 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7777777778 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22347138174 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906534116306 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910798956819 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160445352598 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119227730624 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.