what can be done to reduce global litter?
Human beings are one of the leading cause in a variety of environmental problems, especially litter. There is no doubt that the amount of litter is an excessive increase, as a result, we have to be responsible for this issue by reducing garbage. This essay will discuss measures that governments, individuals and communities can take to address the problem.
Individuals should set an example for other people in their ways of life. The best method would be for them to recycle when possible. According to the US Environmental Protection Organization, 90% of the items going in a landfill could be recycled. For example, instead of throwing away plastic bottles, we can reuse them to make household items such as planters, lamps or trash cans. This can help alleviate a huge volume of waste in the world and is gradually shrinking to landfill sites.
Another solution to eradicate the problem could be to raise the awareness of communities to the detrimental impacts of litter. By organizing cleanup events every week or every month and encouraging people’s participation, we will restrict its influences to natural environment. Taking Singapore, for example, it is considered as the cleanest city in the world because most citizens are aware of negative consequences due to dropping rubbish in public areas.
Governments could certainly make more effort to tackle worldwide waste. They should educate citizens about individual responsibility for proper waste disposal. For instance, environmental activities and seminars are held to call upon and enhance limited knowledge of the public with the support of authorities. In addition to this, the establishment of such organizations as Greenpeace, The United Nations Environment Program and global environmental Facilities states the significance of global environment to every single person and groups.
In conclusion, anyone also should have contribution by taking steps to lessen garbage. It is hopefully that humans can enjoy a much greener and fresher planet with considerably less litter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-27 | kuldip.kumar@hotmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | kuldip.kumar@hotmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | chino0301 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | hitakshi patel | 78 | view |
- The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996 and one possible projection high motorization scenario for their use in 2020 72
- the maps below shows changes that have taken place at the seaside of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 73
- what can be done to reduce global litter 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?With the help of technology, students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly. 89
- TASK : Technology has made the world a better place to live 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Human beings are one of the leading cause in a variety of...
^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less lit'?
Suggestion: less lit
...er and fresher planet with considerably less litter.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44200626959 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12899463145 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611285266458 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2596194082 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.117647059 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190165717513 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542910064624 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545461369 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101428357159 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059010929011 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.