The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050.
The bar chart compares the proportion of dependents in five various countries around the world between 2000 and 2050. It is obvious that the average percentage of world independents is predicted to rise to about 42% in 2050 from around 25% in 2000.
Starting with 2000, of all the five countries India possessed the highest percentage dependents, at almost 40%, while Korea the lowest proportion, at just below 20%. The numbers of dependents in Indonesia, China and Japan were the same, at about 35%.
Turning now to the period from 2000 to 2050, the percentage of the Korean dependents is estimated to ascend most greatly to about 42% in 2050, which will be as large as that of the world average. Meanwhile, the rate in Japan is forecast to increase by 12% to the largest position at 47% in 2050. It is meanwhile to notice that the numbers in Indonesia and China are expected to grow by the same percentage to 39% in 2050. However, in India, the proportion of the dependents will decline to around 30% in 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-27 | HARPREET KAUR MAAN | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | EriolYang | 78 | view |
- New parents should attend parenting class to bring up their children well. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfied job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66480446927 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59470595361 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525139664804 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0373070581 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.375 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437395267326 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190717161042 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15738970448 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312879077688 0.15604864568 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169905127015 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.