Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy; some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree, what are the advantages or disadvantages associated with this.

Submitted by Armidat on Fri, 01/04/2019 - 08:31

Recently, the impact of employees' participation in decision making plans has sparked an ongoing controversy. While some people believe it leads to positive results, others maintain that it is not to the benefit of the company. This essay will discuss why employees can exert a positive influence when being involved in decision making policy.

To begin with, when employees are involved in making decisions, they gain a professional and personal stake in the organization which will eventually lead to its overall success. This commitment leads to increased productivity, job satisfaction, and loyalty due to the fact that employees are actively engaging in various aspects of the company, their opinions are voiced, and the gap between managers and employees is lowered. Overall, such positives increase company's accomplishments. By contrast, those companies who resist against employees' participation in strategic decision making would face grave difficulty to get promoted.

On the other hand, using employees in the decision-making process, rather than outsourcing, saves money and time along with offering long-term reliable assistance from those who know the corporation well. Hiring an outside consulting firm is expensive besides taking up valuable resources in fees and the time spent updating outside consultants in various aspects of the company. However, employees are already aware of these processes, offer insightful knowledge of the company needs, and understand the policies of the company overall.

In conclusion, I completely agree that actively engaging employees in the decision-making process boosts company's success due to increasing company's production and saving consultation budget.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... face grave difficulty to get promoted. On the other hand, using employees in th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...duction and saving consultation budget.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85258964143 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07841570095 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645418326693 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4461090408 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.545454545 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238372971791 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910358940683 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393516924419 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151820693041 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379333984521 0.0609392437508 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.