The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
The table chart compares the percentage of students and their reviews about different aspects of a university from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that teaching quality and electronic resources got improvements, whereas range of modules offered deteriorated. Buildings/teaching facilities and print resources stood at the same level over the period.
In terms of details, the quality of teaching in a university fell by 2%, from 65% to 63%, but then it followed by a slight rise to 69% in 2010. Electronic equipments, however, almost doubled from 45 to 88 percent during 10 years.
On the other hand, there was a gradual decline in the figures of range of modules offered, accounting for a third, 30% and 27%, respectively. The feedback of students about university buildings and other facilities remained at the same level over the each year of a period, at 77 per cent. Moreover the results of a survey about printing resources oscillated between 87% and 89%, ending up with the 88% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | dilipkarki | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | junjunh | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | junjunh | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | junjunh | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Huong Linh | 73 | view |
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
- The tradition that family get together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts 61
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 84
- Holidays honor people or events. If you could create a new holiday, what person or event would it honor and how would you want people to celebrate it? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 78
- The graphs below show the growth in wages within the G7 Nations between 2000 2007 and 2008 2012 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... each year of a period, at 77 per cent. Moreover the results of a survey about printing ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, then, third, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97619047619 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96347282792 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.3648720095 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134930751522 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570811241819 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786387828121 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852484563182 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763936453791 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.