The bar chart compares and contrasts the data on the changes in the time levels, which the UK people spent on telephone calls ( local-fixed line, national and international-fixed line and mobiles) between 1996 and 2002.
Overall, the number of minutes( in billions) for local-fixed line was the highest, while mobiles was the least common choose by british people during 8-year period.
Clearly, local-fixed line was by far highest in the total quantity of time used in england. In 1995, the figure was over 70 minutes, but 4 years later, it climbed steadily to peak at 90 minutes before seeing a gradual reduce in the last given year, which was the same value to the early year.
There was a significant rose in the number of minutes for the others categories, but the figure foe national and international-fixed line was always higher than that for all calls. To specify, nearly 40minutes was used with national and international-fixed by the UK, which was approximately nine times as high as that in mobiles in 1995. Both categories all witnessed an upward trend to the end of the period and reached more than 60 and 40 minutes in the amount of times of each one, respectively.
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012. 73
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 87
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h the UK people spent on telephone calls local-fixed line, national and internati...
^^
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erall, the number of minutes in billions for local-fixed line was the highest, wh...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83663366337 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95634097585 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.2098297305 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.571428571 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137078369273 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654113123952 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322710017512 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885610606534 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264581130052 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.