The four pie charts compare and contrast the data on the changes in the population levels which was divided into three groups (0-14 years, 15-59 years and 60+ years) in yemen and italy in the year of 2000 and predictions for 50 years later.
Overall, people at the age of 0-14 accounted for the largest proportion in yemen in the begining, while italian people who were 15 to 59-year-old made up the most popular population. In contrast, 15 to 59-year-old group is projected to be the highest value by percentage in both countries in 2050.
Clearly, in 2000, population of italy had a tendency to older than that of yemen. To specify, the rate of people who were 15 to 59- year-old accounted for over three-fifth, which was approximately 15% as high as that in yemen. Especially, the 60 and over group came from italy was also higher than that from yemen ( nearly eight times). The figure for people who were under 14 years old saw a contrasting trend, it made up just over a half in yemen and less than a fifth in italy.
There is likely to br see a significant change during the next 50 years. The proportion of people at the age of 60 and over is expected to the highest in both nations, with more and less than a half. There is predicted to be a steadily growth of 18.2% to 42.3% in the figure for italian who were 60+ years old, whereas just more than one in twenty of this group is projected in yemen. The last group( under 14 years old) is likely to experience an upward trend. In detail, the figures are expected to decline slightly to above one fifth and slightly higher than one in ten in yemen and italy, respectively.
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012. 73
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aly was also higher than that from yemen nearly eight times. The figure for peopl...
^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...s than a half. There is predicted to be a steadily growth of 18.2% to 42.3% in the figure for ita...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 300.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45356882928 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7379275024 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120439355616 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542564506067 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430943217494 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866613389899 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223667300495 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.