The chart below shows the total number of minutes(in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The bar graph compares the number of minutes of telephone calls in three categorized types in the United Kingdom between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, it is obvious that local-fixed line was the most popular way of connection throughout the period, however, it decresed in the last years. Whereas, national and international lines had an upward trend and mobile calls grew enormously.
Numerically speaking, there was a gradual rise in the number of minutes spent via local fixed lines hitting a peak in 1999, from initial of just over 70 billion minutes to eventual of around 90 billion minutes. Then, the figures followed by a tumble to the opening features at 70 billion minutes for local- fixed lines. Regarding national and international fixed lines, there was a slight upward trend toward the end of the period, increasing by about 25 billion minutes from 35 to 65 billion minutes, between the years 1995 and 2002.
Turning to the most up-to-date lines of mobile calls, in the first 5 years the numbers escalated by five times, from nearly 2 to 10 billion minutes. But over the rest of a period there was a sharp growth, reaching its peak at approximately 45 billion minutes through mobiles phones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-10 | Vonelattha | 56 | view |
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away? 84
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 78
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. 84
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not others. Some people, therefore, think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects sho 73
- The chart below shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, regarding, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92610837438 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60619533405 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3172962263 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238661634793 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10804392089 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083785490827 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152930781704 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0970149086989 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.