The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The pie charts compare the production of electricity in units by five categorized fuel sources in Australia and France in two years 1980 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the number of units rose in both contries through the period. In Australia coal was the most productive source, whereas France implemented nuclear power to make electricity.
In terms of details, in 1980, the half of all electricity(100 units) in Australia was produced from coal, and it even increased over the next 20 years, making up 130 units of 170 units altogether. Also, nuclear power's production escalated by 16 units from 20 to 36 in Australia. However, there as a collapse in the figures of oil and hydro power sources, from initial of 10 and 20 units respectively to the lowest 2 units for both in 2000.
According to the proportion of France, overall number of manufactured units doubled from 1980 to 2000. The coal remained the same over the period at a quarter units, while oil produced five more units, at 20 and 25 units, accordingly. Natural gas tumbled its productions of electricity from 5 to 2 units, and hydro power had a dip, plunging from 15 to the equal figures with natural gas at 2 units eventually. There was an enormous rise in the number of units of electricity made by nuclear power from 15 to over 125 units in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-12 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
- Some people become famous at young age Is it good thing or bad thing 90
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. 78
- The tradition that family get together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts 61
- In many parts of the world there is continuous coverage of sport on television. Some people believe this discourages the young from taking part in any sport themselves.Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 89
- We all work or will work with many different kinds of people. In your opinion, what are some important characteristics of a coworker(someone you work closely with)? Use reasons and specific examples to explain why these characteristics are important. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'unit'?
Suggestion: unit
...d the same over the period at a quarter units, while oil produced five more units, at...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68669527897 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73181949909 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510729613734 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5810342739 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340114963993 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158495809461 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16185979865 0.0843802449381 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274566404959 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.202112320655 0.0819641961636 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.