Successful sports professionals can earn a lot of more money than people in
other important professions. Some people think that this is fully justified while
others think it is unfair.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
It has been seen that for the previous two decades, the salaries of sportsmen have become a topic of great debate. While some people think that such humongous salaries are totally unjustified, I side with those who believe that lucrative salaries of athletes are entirely justifiable.
On the one hand, it is often argued that sport professionals are paid huge sums of money. One of the most common argument put forth by these people is that there are better ways to spend the money given as wages to sport persons. They believe that giving too much money to a single sportsman is totally out of question. In addition, they say that this money can be used to increase salaries of those who are unable to afford a decent meal. Furthermore, there are those who feel that sport at international level is not that necessary. They believe that it is just a waste of time not only for the people playing the sport but also for the people watching it. Hence, sportsmen should be paid wisely.
On the other hand, I personally hold the opinion that the lucrative salary packages given to athletes are entirely legitimate. In my view international sportsmen bear enormous levels of psychological stress. It is because the dignity of their entire nation is dependent on their performance. Therefore, their salary is totally fair. Similarly, another reason I think is that not every person becomes an international level athlete. The reason behind this is becoming a sportsmen demands lifelong struggle, dedication and hard work. Had becoming a sportsman was easy, every other person would have been an international athlete. The most important justification I firmly believe is the short careers of athletes. It is because they only have ten or twenty years of their youth after which they are replaced by young and energetic athletes. Footballers, for instance, retire at a very early age as compared to people in other profession. Thus their six figure annual salary is justified.
In conclusion, although the idea of spending millions of dollar on sport professionals looks absurd because of prevailing poverty, it is entirely justifiable due to their short careers and their life long struggle. Therefore, on balance, I believe that sport professionals are paid reasonably.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-22 | happychords | 67 | view |
- While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree. give your opinion with relevant example. 73
- Successful sports professionals can earn a lot of more money than people inother important professions. Some people think that this is fully justified whileothers think it is unfair.Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 67
- while recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualifications and experience To what extent do you agree or disagree give your opinion with relevant example 85
- The best way to tackle the problem of obesity is to educate people about healthy eating To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree. give your opinion with relevant example. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 937, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...compared to people in other profession. Thus their six figure annual salary is justi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06933333333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79593864183 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522666666667 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9310685594 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4090909091 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0454545455 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16248213896 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429736055074 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412502417229 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992280656792 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394371042132 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.