The maps illustrate the differences between the development plan and the current condition of a town called Islip.
Overall, the plan shows that there will be more buildings built and a dual carriageway will be constructed.
The first change is the city center will be broadened bigger to replace the countryside. Looking more closely at the map predicting the future for the city, there is the appearance of a two-lane road running around the town center, which makes it easier for transporting in and out the downtown. Then, the main road in the middle of Islip will be replaced with a pedestrian street only. In the center of Islip, the shopping area in the north is planned to be demolished to make way for several constructions namely bus station, shopping center, car park, as well as a noticeable addition of new houses in the most north. Households in the south of the center will be constructed to become larger, which results in the narrow down condition of the only park in Islip.
However, the school outside the dual carriageway will be renovated into a bigger school because of more citizens living in Islip. The final foreseeable feature is that houses nearby the school will remain unchanged.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 84
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 67
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009 84
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 84
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by fore types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92233009709 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69810349428 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558252427184 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2261552049 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206401667785 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890365644711 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798942962581 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130471754089 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103589793366 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.