The two diagrams illustrate the differences in diseases in two groups of countries which are developing and developed ones. As can be seen from the pie charts, the proportion of fatal sicknesses is different in the two mentioned groups and infectious and parasitic diseases make up the largest amount in underdeveloped nations while that of unmentioned diseases is the greatest in industrialized nations.
In underprivileged countries, heart disease accounts for 43%, which is nearly 2 times higher than that in wealthy nations, 24%. On the contrary, the percentage for cancer makes up merely 9% in developing nations, which is 12% lower than that in their developed counterparts.
Moreover, looking at the percentage of people having infectious and parasitic diseases, we can see a 45- time difference in the percentage of infectious and parasitic diseases in developing countries and developed one, at 46% and 1% respectively. The charts also show that other diseases are the least common in unwealthy nations, which contribute only 2% whereas they make up the largest proportion in industrialized countries, 54%.
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 64
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both views and giv 78
- The line graph shows the cost for watching films. The pie charts show the change in the percentage of market share represented by the three forms. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n that in their developed counterparts. Moreover, looking at the percentage of p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4367816092 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22689762442 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.8266012926 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.666666667 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30182502823 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14752023421 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503909925454 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20267792517 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248741014563 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.