Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In the given argument stem, the author contends that in any given fields which could be arts, business, Science and Technology and others, the critical judgements that are coming from a person who is an expert in their respective fields are of high value and if it is coming from someone with not a very strong experience background has a little value. In my opinion, it is the quality of the judgement and also the relevance to the issue which determines whether the critical judgement is valuable or not. The source definitely influences the judgements as we expect an experienced person to provide better inputs due to the time spent by that person learning more about their fields.
Any expert is an expert in a field not just because of this time spent in that specific sector but also the knowledge that person has due to which he is called an expert. For instance, in the field of technology where I work, when we are developing a software and after building the code we feel it is impossible to break or hack into it, but when reviewed by the subject matter experts, they identify various types of bugs and that too in less time which itself proves that the inputs from these experts are valuable and time efficient.
Let us take another example from the field of sports, in cricket as well we used to have a human third umpire to give the final verdict in case of any doubts during the match, though now they have been replaced by the Artificial intelligence. However, it does not imply that the decisions of the other umpires are worthless, have littele value. Even in the example provide above does not mean that the decisions taken by us during coding or examination of the code was of little importance but relatively has a little value. An expert opinion is always regarded above.
Hence, to conclude, judgements from all sources should be embraced with open arms but definitely, if a statistics is taken an expert will always have a better judgement of work than non experts, but that does not mean one should disparage the others by calling their work of little value or insignificant as they are still in their growing phase. Also, very important fact not to forget is that, today who is an expert was once a beginner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | tg763622253 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | ghazalsaed1995 | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Dipu2012 | 33 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- A recent study by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that employees with paid sick leave are 28 percent less likely to be involved in a work-related accident than employees who do not receive payment for sick leave. Researchers hypothesiz 54
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones (cell phones with Internetaccess), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping intouch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 90
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 88
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ogy where I work, when we are developing a software and after building the code w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, still, third, well, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 397.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63979848866 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46745980683 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501259445844 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.247100106 60.3974514979 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.454545455 118.986275619 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0909090909 23.4991977007 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269185812608 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973294993454 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917866144276 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159134444499 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660738928708 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.1392134831 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 48.8420337079 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.