The environmental problems facing today’s world are so great that there is little ordinary people can to improve the situation. Governments and large companies should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Environmental issues have caused tremendous consequences for human lives. Some people contend that individuals cannot help mitigate the problems; therefore, authorities and big companies are ones who have the responsibility to reduce the effects of environmental problems. However, I do think that both every citizen and the governments or entrepreneurs should join hand to tackle the issues.
On the one hand, each individual can contribute greatly to protect the environment. Firstly, households should reduce the use of plastic daily. The amount of plastic waste for domestic use is enormous; therefore, in order to reduce the consequences of plastic, every person should avoid using plastic bags when going shopping and single-use plastic bottles as well. Secondly, instead of using fossil fuels which cause greenhouse gas, reusable energy like solar power and wind energy is considerately worthwhile. Finally, using public transport more frequently is a measure that every human being should take. For example, in some Western countries, people are encouraged to commute by bikes, buses and underground trains to reduce gas emissions. Consequently, just by some small changes in a daily habit that ordinary people can contribute to the progress to improve the environment.
On the other hand, there is significant action that governments and companies should take to resolve the problem. In terms of governments, legislation should be enacted in order to force manufacturers to reduce the use of plastic in packaging. Moreover, there should be a policy for supermarkets to use paper or fabric bags instead of plastic ones. Additionally, authorities should allocate more money on renovating and refurbishing public transport system. Only by doing so can citizens change their minds to stop using private vehicles. From the companies’ perspective, employers should obey the laws and stop polluting rivers and the air by emitting toxic and gas into nature.
From the above-mentioned, both individuals and authorities or businesses should have the responsibility to reduce the severe effects of environmental issues. Young people should try harder to protect the Earth for the next generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-07 | aria etemadi | 89 | view |
- The line graph shows the cost for watching films. The pie charts show the change in the percentage of market share represented by the three forms. 78
- The table below describes the proportion of smokers in males and females between the age of 15 and 20 in Britain 65
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 722, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reducing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reducing
... by bikes, buses and underground trains to reduce gas emissions. Consequently, just by so...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61976047904 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12008945821 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559880239521 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7472184333 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.277777778 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94444444444 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278309531612 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877518756336 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407606508177 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171043914401 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106445134852 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.