The tables illustrate the sales of two kinds of goods namely coffee and bananas which were labeled Fairtrade in the European countries during a period of 5 years between 1999 and 2004. The Fairtrade labels indicate that products are manufactured from farmers in developing countries which they are paid a fair price.
Overall, as can be seen from the chart that the figure for sales of the two products generally increased significantly except for sales of bananas in Sweden and Denmark. Units are measured in millions of euros.
In terms of the sales of labeled coffee, the figure for Britain only stood at 1.5 million euros; however, it saw a remarkable improvement of 18.5 million euros, 14 million euros more than that of Switzerland in 2004. Sales of coffee in Denmark contributed only 1.8 million euros, followed by 1 million euros of fair trade coffee products’ sales in Belgium, then the former increased only 0.2 million euros while the latter experienced a rise of 0.7 million euros. Finally, sales in Sweden was merely around 1 million euros during the time shown.
Meanwhile, sales of fair trade of bananas in Switzerland increased by 32 million euros over the period. The figure for the UK and Belgium rose slowly to just 5.5 and 4 million euros respectively in 2004. On the contrary, sales for bananas in Sweden witnessed a small fall of 0.8 million euros, followed by a 1.1 million euros decline for that of Denmark.
- The flowchart illustrates the production of coloured plastic paper clips in a small factory.Write a report for a university tutor describing the production process. 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 59
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by fore types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 65
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which the goods are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 90
- The charts show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, then, while, except for, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93442622951 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61012489134 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504098360656 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2604276838 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.4 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1839022702 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883910079226 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890148342476 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136179162496 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873128675381 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.