The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists.
The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists.Overall, Before the construction the island was not suitable for tourism.However, after the construction island is suitable for tourism.
In one hand we have a picture if the island when is not constructed yet, just had one small beach which was not suited for swimming.
In other hand we have a picture of the island already developed and suitable for tourists.Now there are, in north a restaurant, in the middle of the island is the reception and around reception there are available bungalows on the south there is port also the beach which was not suitable for swimming now is available also very important thing, there are foot paths and vehicle tracks
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-26 | Martin9604 | 56 | view |
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists 56
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of population aged 65 over between 1940-2040 in a period of 100 years in three different countries.They are: USA, Sweden and Japan 73
- the charts below show the main reasons for study support by their employers. 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 67
- In some countries people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing and starting university studies. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...after the construction of some tourists.Overall, Before the construction the island was...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...the island was not suitable for tourism.However, after the construction island is suit...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tourism.However, after the construction island is suitable for tourism. In on...
^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Now
...ady developed and suitable for tourists.Now there are, in north a restaurant, in th...
^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... there are foot paths and vehicle tracks
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 626.0 965.302439024 65% => OK
No of words: 126.0 196.424390244 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96825396825 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.35036895883 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95796536202 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 67.0 106.607317073 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531746031746 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 22.4926829268 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.633752787 43.030603864 243% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 208.666666667 112.824112599 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.0 22.9334400587 183% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371453646325 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.261809997512 0.103423049105 253% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.272860888748 0.0843802449381 323% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261809997512 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.272860888748 0.0819641961636 333% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.0 13.2329268293 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.31 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.3012195122 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 17.0 40.7170731707 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.9970731707 171% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.