Some people think that public health of a country can be improved if the government make laws regarding nutritious food but others think that it is the matter of personal choice and personal responsibility.
Due to the escalating pollution and huge population, healthy food is a great concern for many. While healthcare budget for the government is increasing each year, the public health condition, on the contrary, is deteriorating. Some opine that the government needs to pass laws regarding food intake to improve the public health, while others oppose this idea as they believe that it is a matter of individual choice. The following paragraphs will shed some light on this debate before drawing a logical conclusion.
To begin with, healthy lifestyle is a choice and habit of an individual. No matter how many laws are passed and how strictly the government monitors the food quality, if a person does not follow the healthy lifestyle and eating habit, he will surely suffer from health related issues. Thus the choices of individuals greatly affect the overall health condition of a nation. To lead a healthy life citizens do not need expensive food, gym facilities, expert dieticians and so on. For instance, the rich population of a country suffers from obesity, diabetics and many other diseases that are less frequent among the middle-class people. This proves that purchasing ability and budget are not the most important aspect of a healthy life.
On the other side, use of chemicals, preservatives and adhesives in food items should be totally banned and only the government can ensure that. Even after having proper diet and exercise, if people are forced to eat foods that have unexpected chemicals, they would suffer from dangerous diseases. Using unauthorised chemicals, selling expired and low-quality food should be forbidden. Infrequent market monitoring and the lack of quality control for food items are two reasons our market is full of unhygienic food items. The government's initiative can greatly reduce this unexpected corruption and crime in the food industry and market.
To conclude, the citizens of a country have to practise a healthy lifestyle while the government should ensure the hygiene in food production and food sells. Both of their combined initiatives and efforts can greatly promote the public health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 84 | view |
- Young drivers are careless and overconfident, and too many are killed in accidents. To eliminate this problem, we could teach children the skills of safe driving while they are at schools. 67
- Even though organic fruits and vegetables are more expensive than conventional fruits and vegetables they are worth the extra cost. 61
- In a public funded healthcare system people who are willing to pay for the best and fast treatment should be able to do so To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- World history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than under female leadership. So, for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership. 78
- Children in some parts of the world have less responsibility compared to children in the past. Some people think this as a positive change, however, others think of it as a negative change.What do you think? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rely suffer from health related issues. Thus the choices of individuals greatly affe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 737, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ost important aspect of a healthy life. On the other side, use of chemicals, pre...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26239067055 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74746655094 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577259475219 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2747307933 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.176470588 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276697092459 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793607592007 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061511286923 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160854488485 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291940809076 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.