People should choose their course of study not on the basis of their own interests, but based on the kinds of jobs they can get.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Some argue that people should not opt for the courses which they are interested in, rather they should study a course based on the job. This essay completely disagrees with the statement, because studying will become boring and it leads to stress.
First of all, studying is not a one time task, it is a recurring activity. People should study a subject area based on their interest. This will broaden their horizons. When a student or a professional study a course based on interest, they would really work hard to understand the deeper context. This will eventually lead to success in exam and job. In addition, when people study out of personal interest they come up with more creative ideas. To prove this particularly effective, A recent survey by the Mother Teresa University has revealed that, students are more likely to get jobs easily in their interested area compared to the ones who study a course just to get a job.
On the other hand, studying is a mundane job, when it is not interesting. Things do not turn up positive most times when they are forced. Similarly, when a course is not done out of self-interest, it does not bring fruitful results. It results in stress. For example, if an employee is forced to do a course for a project without interest he will not do well, this adds stress both to employer and employee. As a result, the ROI will be affected. Hence, it is advised to take the course based on a personal wish.
To end, a job is essential for life, but it should not be boring and adding stress to live.
</span>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | Shivam7090 | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | SaranyaJeevesh | 61 | view |
| 2018-02-27 | n0air9x9 | 89 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The pie chart illustrate the proportion of electricity produced by different fuels such as oil, coal, natural gas, hydropower and nuclear power. 73
- People born today can expect to live longer than people in previous generations. What are some of the positive and negative implications of this phenomenon?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experienc 56
- The line graph depicts the proportion of tourists to England who visited Art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier, and Festival between 1980 to 2010. 73
- Although riding bicycle brings enormous health and environment benefits, the time taken to travel is more compared to other forms of transports 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, really, similarly, so, well, for example, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74551971326 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85655212315 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5433078279 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8823529412 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320026178744 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993918093203 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698098505152 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184832920024 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945037133837 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.