Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour. (opinion) Therefore, the working hours should be reduced.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In the era of globalization, humans are making humans are making huge technology advancements. Although progress in technology and automation has increased the efficiency of the system and thus resulted in the reduction of manual labour. I staunchly agree with the statement that machines have contributed to the improvement of work-life balance. In the below paragraphs I will put forward relevant examples to elucidate further.
Firstly improvement in technology has brought in an era of digitization where information technology plays a pivotal role in complementing and enabling the system to be more efficient. For instance, earlier producing a network diagram for a complex telecommunication network used to take many days but with the use of automation software, a similar job can be accomplished in a few hours. Hence this has led to a reduction of man-hours which can be used to improve work-life balance for employees working globally. In a recent article published by The Reuters due to the introduction of automation in some companies in the United States, the working hours have been reduced for employees.
However, the introduction of automated software’s and computerization has led to a decrease in the possibility of human error which happened earlier due to callous human behaviour thus avoiding the repetition of the task. For instance, in a Bank, human currency counting is replaced by computerized machine counting which is correct and reduces the error caused due to human counting. This has led to the reduction of the repetitive task and eventually reduced the working hours. In Canada, many banks have employed new automation software which has reduced the human error rate and thus today the banks have reduced the working hours for its employees.
To conclude the advent of automation and technology are bringing efficiency, reducing the human error and reducing the man-hours for a particular task thus, in my opinion, the working hours should be reduced for the employee to enable them to have a better work-life balance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-12 | vinshu koul | 73 | view |
- You have recently started work in new company. Write a letter to your friend.In the letter Explain why you change job, Describe your new job, Tell him your other news.You do NOT need to write any addresses.Begin your letter as follows: 73
- you have had bank account for a few years. Recently you received a letter from the bank stating that your account is $240 overdrawn and that you will be charged $70 which will be taken directly from your account. you know that this information is incorrec 73
- A Canadian friend recently sent you a present by post. You want to thank him/her.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter-Say how you felt when you received the present-Describe what you like about it-Explain how you will use the presentTruly delight 89
- You forgot something important on the bus you traveled on Write a letter to the bus company and say Describe what you are looking for You phoned the company before but their response didn t help you explain why What do you want the manager to do about it 72
- write a letter complaining about accommodation 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...job can be accomplished in a few hours. Hence this has led to a reduction of man-hour...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32415902141 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12928175556 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480122324159 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.9685224609 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.923076923 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301037062355 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10823900687 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080129860358 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199630307094 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741611613834 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.