Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Chief executives and managers have been debating over assigning tasks to their workers in order to make them satisfied. They are thinking about novel methods to increase the company's productivity rate via workers satisfaction. Meanwhile, some of them believe that if workers do specific tasks, they can become an expert in their field and accordingly satisfied. Some believe that by allocating different types of duties, they can become more satisfied. I agree with the late view. Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks because they can use and show their talents, and they may not become tired of a regular work.
First and foremost, by sticking to fix routine tasks on and on, we may become exhausted. All of us know that when we do a repetitious work on and on for a long time we may become fatigued. As a result, we cannot accomplish our jobs in a well manner. We may use to do our duties for a long time and even don't enjoy doing it anymore. This can also lead to declination in the rate of productivity of the company. By doing different types of tasks we can maintain our passion about the job we work in. Moreover, we can never acquire new skills by doing repetitive tasks. Recently conducted research from the University of Stanford shows that worker doing different tasks during their working schedule are more knowledgeable and more competent. Thus, the more we stick to a routine daily timetable, the more we may become exhausted.
Furthermore, by doing variable chores, workers can show their talents, and become more satisfied. As we know, diverse tasks need different skills. Hence, by doing many different chores we may explore numerous talents in ourselves. For instance, I worked in a website design company as a programmer, but I didn't know about my skills in graphic designing until my boss gave me a shot in graphic design. After doing a couple of projects in this field, I totally switched my career toward this path. Besides, should we accomplish a lot of task, we can fortify our talents. Trying different work fields can boost our creativity because we can use our various skills together and bring about a new solution. As a proverb says "what you think about, bring about". Consequently, exploring and using our diverse talents can help us to sense the feeling of fulfilment about our job and ourselves. Hence, the more we try new tasks, the more we become satisfied.
All in all, trying different tasks not only can help us to find our hindered abilities which we may not know about them, it can help us to not become hopeless in the long run. It will be predicted that, by the 2050, most companies will have planned to rotate their employees in separate divisions to give them an opportunity to experience new tasks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 524, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks because they can use and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... do our duties for a long time and even dont enjoy doing it anymore. This can also l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... need different skills. Hence, by doing many different chores we may explore numerous talents ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e design company as a programmer, but I didnt know about my skills in graphic designi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun task seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of tasks'.
Suggestion: a lot of tasks
...his path. Besides, should we accomplish a lot of task, we can fortify our talents. Trying dif...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help us find' instead.
Suggestion: help us find
...ll, trying different tasks not only can help us to find our hindered abilities which we may not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 9.8082437276 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2310.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79253112033 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64209805851 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473029045643 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 721.8 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5179768398 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5555555556 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8518518519 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287682546151 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897267306334 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897596865923 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194018704862 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104628373984 0.0645574589148 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.