In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Fast food consumption, these days, is gaining popularity among people worldwide. The excessive intake of it in a few countries is causing health problems in growing number of people. Some people believe that governments should levy heavy taxes on this type of food. In my opinion, I completely agree with this viewpoint that governments ought to take part; however, other measures are also important.
To begin with, higher tariff implementation on the junk food by the concerned authorities is one of the most effective ways in reducing the consumption of it. This will increase the price of it and most poor people might not afford to buy it every day. As the law of economics states that as the price of goods soars, more people avoid buying it. For example, in India, the smoking and drinking habits became prevalent among youngsters in 2016. Therefore, the government of India imposed 25 per cent extra taxes on it and, as a result, cigarette and alcohol consumption significantly reduced during that year.
However, merely governments’ actions are not sufficient in curbing the use of it; in fact, an individual must also take part in it. As a person has more control on his own choices, therefore, he needs to be more conscious about unhealthy eating. Fat producing junk food should be avoided as much as possible. In addition, daily exercises can also mitigate unhealthy diet-related problems. According to health experts, those who exercise an hour a day, fat concentration in their body is 70 per cent lower than those who do not exercise.
In summary, eating junk food is having deleterious impact on person’s health. The government should levy higher excise on it, yet an individual ought to take other measures too in order to curb the hazards of it. If proper and swift action is taken, this problem can be resolved easily. It is recommended to lower the intake of fast food as much as possible because it is extremely harmful for our health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | aeropiyush | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Vivek kachhadiya | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Thaonguyen1409 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | smelias339 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
- Fast food is a part of life in many place Some people think this has bad effects in lifestyle and diet Do you agree or disagree Give reasons 87
- Your friend wants to come to your city and stay with you for one week for a holiday. However, it is impossible for you to accompany him. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter, you should:1) Apologize to your friend2) Explain why you cannot stay wi 73
- Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people sugar consumption, while others think that it is individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both view and 73
- The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- You have recently stayed in a hotel and after returning back you realize that you have left a piece of cloth at your hotel room Write a letter to manager of hotel In the letter you should explain the clothing say where you left it what the manager should 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in fact, in summary, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93975903614 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81863343491 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593373493976 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1438935937 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1111111111 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287903735275 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806703519785 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560053970508 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173312720498 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736781363636 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.