The table compares England’s travelling by various modes of transport from 1985 to 2000.
According to the table, many transportation increased in term of distance per person. There was a considerable rise in the usage of car, long distance bus train, taxi and other. Furthermore, the most fashionable mode was car at 3,199 miles to 4,806 miles, standing at around 80% of all English used it in 1985 and 2000.
On the other hand, some transportation methods were less popularity during 15-year period. There was a slight decline in walking and bicycle, from 255 miles to 237 miles in 2000 for walking and from 51 miles to 41 miles for bicycle in 2000, whereas, local bus usage was dropped significantly from 429 miles to 274 miles. Even through, taxi was the last position in 1985 at only 13 miles, bicycle was the least popularity transport in 2000. As well, people in England tend to travel longer distance from 4,740 miles in 1985 to 6,475 miles in 2000.
In conclusion, some mode of transport was increasing, and majority people used car for travelling.
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025 .Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 61
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun transportation seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much transportation', 'a good deal of transportation'.
Suggestion: much transportation; a good deal of transportation
...985 to 2000. According to the table, many transportation increased in term of distance per perso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9010989011 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73597685949 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9567683912 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1111111111 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163325551934 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870496538114 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109108444068 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142771565253 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12504221336 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.