The bar chart illustrates the time of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories: local-fixed line, national and international-fixed line, and mobile (all calls), from 1995 till 2002. The number is measured in billions.
In the 1999, local fixed-line was used 100 minutes, it is the highest point of this call type. The lowest point of this represent approximately 70 minutes in 2002.
The using of national and international-fixed lines at the middle of this graph and it grew only gradually. In 1995 it had the rate between 30 and 40 minutes, 1997 it increased to approximately 45 minutes, in 1999 this type was used 50 minutes. So, it has not a big difference. But, comparing it with the local-fixed line, the bar chat shows that national and international-fixed lines are less popular.
The reverse of the 1995 in telephone call are mobile calls, less than 10 minutes in the UK. It considerably increased till 2002. The rate shows approximately 45 minutes, that is lower than national and international-fixed line, and local-fixed line.
Overall, the highest point of local fixed line is in the 1999 year, the highest point of national and international-fixed line is in 2002 and, also, this year figures the pick of mobile using.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features. 56
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.995215311 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35493712648 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488038277512 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.1232189244 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.41666666667 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126556952319 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602350281467 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723723244658 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982996857228 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899172999162 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.