The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of
developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to
2010.
The table below illustrates how much money donated to support technology, by US,EU and other countries charities, in billions of US dollars over the period 2006 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the total aid increased rapidly in 4 years. Included in it, US charities gave most of money for donation.
The number of total aid given rose significantly from $15,7 billion in 2006 to $30 billion in 2010, rising almost $14,5 billion in the whole periods. US charities contributes most of money which grew steadily from $9.7 billion in 2006 to reach the peak at $22.7 billion in 2010. However, donation of other charities also increased.
In EU countries, there was a slowly grow in money aid each year from $3.3 billion in 2006 to $3.8 billion in 2008, followed by a slight fall in next year, before reach $4.0 billion in 2010. Contribution in other countries also rose. Although a same fluctuation to EU charities in amount of money given each year, donation went up from $2.7 billion to $3.3 billion at the end of the period .
- Today, humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 73
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households 76
- The pie graphs below compare the percentages of carbohydrates, protein, and fat in three different types of diet. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , EU
...ney donated to support technology, by US,EU and other countries charities, in billi...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... dollars over the period 2006 to 2010. Overall, it is clear that the total aid ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities gave most of money for donation. The number of total aid given rose signi...
^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n to .3 billion at the end of the period .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65555555556 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59062417148 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6505351161 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325224392681 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146684201818 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063515976866 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210540565064 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572444924623 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.