The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology ofdeveloping countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to2010.

Essay topics:

The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of
developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to
2010.

The table chart illustrates how much money was donated in support of technology of developing countries in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010.
Overall, The total money increased after 4 years. While the US gave most money , the other countries donated the least.
Looking at the trend of the total aid , it started at 15.7 billion dollars and ended at 30 billion dollars in the year 2010 which was nearly 2 times higher than the beginning figure. The amount of money given by the US increased significantly by 13 billion dollars.Over a 4-year period , America shared most of the money , with 9.7billion dollars from 2006 to 22.7 billion dollars in 2010.
Moving to EU countries and other countries , the figures were not so different.Both of them grew gradually by nearly 0.7 biliion dollars after 4 years .While EU countries grew after every year , other nations rose to 3.1 billion in the year 2008 and saw a fell to 2.6 and increased again to 3.3 billion at the end .

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-30 tuanly 73 view
2019-03-28 Tri H. Ho 61 view
2019-03-17 lynn1901 67 view
2019-01-02 Anh Hong Nguyen 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...money increased after 4 years. While the US gave most money , the other countries...
^^
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r 4 years. While the US gave most money , the other countries donated the least. ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the other countries donated the least. Looking at the trend of the total aid , ...
^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Looking at the trend of the total aid , it started at 15.7 billion dollars and ...
^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Over
...sed significantly by 13 billion dollars.Over a 4-year period , America shared most o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 13 billion dollars.Over a 4-year period , America shared most of the money , with...
^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eriod , America shared most of the money , with 9.7billion dollars from 2006 to 22...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2006 to 22.7 billion dollars in 2010. Moving to EU countries and other countri...
^^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ving to EU countries and other countries , the figures were not so different.Both ...
^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Both
...ies , the figures were not so different.Both of them grew gradually by nearly 0.7 bi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nearly 0.7 biliion dollars after 4 years .While EU countries grew after every year...
^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...arly 0.7 biliion dollars after 4 years .While EU countries grew after every year , ot...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...While EU countries grew after every year , other nations rose to 3.1 billion in th...
^^
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ncreased again to 3.3 billion at the end .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70930232558 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57050027756 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552325581395 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.5136524309 43.030603864 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.0 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330250330129 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182134551146 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135549113599 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233029535933 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120242771744 0.0819641961636 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.