The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited certain brighton attractions between 1980 and 2010. We can see that in 1980 and in 2010 the favourite attractions were the pavilion and the festival. In 1980 the least popular attraction was the pier but in 2010 this changed and the art gallery was the least popular.
During the 1980s and 1990s there was a sharp increase in visitors to the pavilion from 28% to 48% and then the percentage gradually went down to 31% in 2010. The trend for the art gallery was similar to the pavilion. visitors increased rapidly from 22% to 37% from 1980 to 1985 then gradually decreased to less than 10% over the next twenty-five years. The number of tourists who visited the brighton festival fluctuated slightly but in general remained steady at about 25%. visitors to the pier also fluctuated from 1980 to 2000 then rose significantly from 12% to 22% between 2000 and 2010
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | Trần Thị Như Quỳnh | 84 | view |
- When designing a building, the intended use of the building should be taken in into account as important rather than the outward appearance?To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Many people believe that social network sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree? 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007. 67
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville. 78
- The Diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Visitors
...rt gallery was similar to the pavilion. visitors increased rapidly from 22% to 37% from ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Visitors
...n general remained steady at about 25%. visitors to the pier also fluctuated from 1980 t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73619631902 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49348581093 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533742331288 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9858180347 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135086887649 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759141935033 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127040098778 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123300485339 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728344587295 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.