Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars.
To what extent do you agree?
Two days ago, I read an article about implementing community work in the justice system. Some lawyers claimed that judges should extensively use it making verdicts. This essay agrees with this point of view for the following reasons.
The first reason is that community service is more beneficial for society than confinement. Although the labor market has a balanced between employees and job offers, some workplaces experience a shortage of employees. If the convict with petty crime were allowed to do these jobs for free, then they would benefit the public because their contribution would be voluntary. Furthermore, they can be employed to do low-qualified jobs, including sweeping main streets, painting the fences and picking liter, but only under the supervision of police officers. For example, Karaganda city has become much cleaner and brighter once prisoners started to do community work.
Another reason why voluntary jobs by prisoners should be an option as a verdict is that the convict with minor offences should avoid rub shoulders with more serious criminals. Convicted for the pickpocketing and shoplifting, a prisoner may learn from either serial killers or bank robbers how to commit more serious crimes after the sentence in jail. Thus, it is important to separate them apart instead of imprisoning together by offering community work for minor crimes as a form of penalty. For instance, the police department, in Almaty city, has registered a decreasing number of major crimes as soon as the justice system took unpaid as a penalty for minor crimes in 2018.
However, some prosecutors believe that offenders should not have the opportunity to pay their crimes by doing community work. The main argument for this point of view is that they are more likely to break the law again. They say that criminals should serve their sentence in prison, irrespective the type of the, because prison will help them understand the consequences. Despite this, the government has no funding to build more prisons to accommodate all of them so it is crucial for justice system should exempt some convict from imprisoning.
In conclusion, judges should consider community work as a measure of punishment for minor crimes, since it is profitable for both the public and helpful for some criminals to avoid meeting more serious criminals in jail.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-04-03 | Tolik | 84 | view |
2019-04-03 | Tolik | 78 | view |
2019-04-03 | Tolik | 78 | view |
2019-01-03 | VishvAdthakkar | 56 | view |
2019-01-03 | VishvAdthakkar | 73 | view |
- It is inevitable that as technology advances traditional cultures will be lost It seems that we cannot have these two things together To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- What are the pros and cons for children of watching television 78
- A friend you met last year has invited you to visit him/her in his/her country. You have never been there before and need some information before you leave.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:request advise about a gift for his/her familyask abo 56
- You work for a company You have seen some information online about a training course that would be useful for your work Write a letter to your manager In your letter give details of the course say how the course would be useful explain how the company cou 81
- Some people believe that sports are a key element in our society, while others argue that it’s just a recreational activity to be done in one’s free time. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s experience a shortage of employees. If the convict with petty crime were allowe...
^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...nce in prison, irrespective the type of the, because prison will help them understan...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21578947368 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73020957462 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576315789474 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2835664892 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.588235294 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202157640042 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688306968684 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465810165278 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115713608908 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363540809901 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.