TPO 38 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People hold different attitudes towards whether one can naturally be a leader. In my opinion, I absolutely agree with the statement that any one of us can learn to become a successful leader in our life. There are 2 reasons supporting my views which will be explored in the following essay.
First of all, leadership can be defined as how one person guides other people to do specific tasks. As such, the leader must know exactly what requisites are needed and how to get the tasks accomplished. These things certainly can only be obtained through learning and experience. There is no way that a company director guarantees the stability and prosperity of his company without having sufficient knowledge on cash flow, human resources or administration. My own example exemplifies this idea. I joined my company ten years ago as an entry technician. After years of working, absorbing knowledge and instructions from my previous supervisors, I gradually became group leader and now head of technical department. This example clearly shows that my current management position is an outcome of continuous learning.
Secondly, capability of inspiring other people is one of the most important characteristics of leadership. Therefore, it is indispensible to have effective presentation skills so that you can inspire or persuade others. Those skills certainly do not come naturally. In stead, they are the result of attending training courses or learning from other people. My current company president is a compelling example. He is the third son of a poor family with low education background. However, he focused his time and energy to acquire professional knowledge and other soft skills including speaking in front of public and effective oral presentation. Consequently, he has the ability to inspire other employees and even this boss. Gradually, he was appointed as chief executive office and later president of our company.
In conclusion, I completely disagree that leadership is an inherent power. In stead, my vote is given to the fact that this valuable capability is built based on our continuous studying from schools and other colleagues throughout our career.
- road safety 67
- TPO 19 - Many consumers ignore commercial advertisement. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing”. The advertisers hire people-buzzers-who personally promote (buzz) product to people they know or meet. The k 80
- TPO 25 - In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jar contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron 54
- TPO 31 - the fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones of Sinosauropteryx fossil are feathers. 70
- TPO 39 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...dying from schools and other colleagues through out our career.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29970326409 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05707116724 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617210682493 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3983529056 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1818181818 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3181818182 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21085110355 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568586010283 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620952841265 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124824877232 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873275326072 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.