The given line graph illustrates how much garbage recycled in US between 1960 and 2011.
Overall, Line graph generally tend to climb throughout all years. However, 2 types of movement is clearly observed by between 1960 and 1985 and from 1985 to 211.
Within 25 years from 1960, percent recycling was more than total garbage recycling. Amount of waste recovery gradually increased from 5.6 million tons to 16.7 million tons to 1985. Similarly, percent recycling insignificantly increased between 6.4% and 10.1% but only in 1965 declined by 0.4%.
By contrast, between 1985 and 2011 total waste recovery went up more rapidly than percent recycling. Within the decade from 1985 a growth of percent recycling rose by about 2.5 times to 25.7% and then between 1995 and 2011 speed of a growth clearly reduced to 34.7%. However, amount of garbage recycling jumped from 16.7 million tons to 86.9 million tons from 1985 to 2011.
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.discuss both th 78
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will became a thing of the past. To what extent do you agree? 84
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tween 1985 and 2011 total waste recovery went up more rapidly than percent recycl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03921568627 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43073995566 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0744423375 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6666666667 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280251051267 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123460005451 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563517652289 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187321184103 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439543436463 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.