Computer technology
Nowadays, the use of computer technology has increased, which attracted numerous controversies. Some people contend that this is good for people. Others reject this notion and argue that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in society. This essay will further elaborate both sides with the examples and thus will lead to a plausible conclusion.
On the one hand, some point that one of the most significant benefits of computer technology is the availability of extra time. For example, mother, unlike in the past, now have more time to spend with their families, thanks to efficient computerised household machinery. Also, the international organisation is now taking a great initiative in educating its citizens about the benefits of computer technology. Citizens are spending their quality time in learning the new computer technologies to meet gain more experience.
On the other hand, there is a deluge of arguments in favour of people who hold the opposite view. One of the most preponderant ones is that computer dependency has negative consequences for the community in various ways. Firstly, people are losing jobs because machines are increasingly taking over the roles of humans, such as in the car manufacturing sector. According to 'Herald Magazine January 2013 edition', Americans employed in manufacturing has dropped from 30 percent to 10 percent today. Secondly, because of technological dependency, people are becoming shiftless and less efficient.
In light of the discussion above, I would like to suggest that the use of computer technology is beneficial for flora and fauna.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | manraj123 | 65 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | gobindh Singh | 72 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | gobindh Singh | 86 | view |
| 2019-06-05 | Dilpreet singh | 69 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | amritpal223 | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us will lead to a plausible conclusion. On the one hand, some point that one of ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hnologies to meet gain more experience. On the other hand, there is a deluge of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... becoming shiftless and less efficient. In light of the discussion above, I woul...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35177865613 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99740809884 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604743083004 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.5914577835 50.4703680194 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.7142857143 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325610362775 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112202349621 0.0925447433944 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129873344248 0.071462118173 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204327063072 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820020788594 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.