Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Lucida Sans Unicode", sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">Nowadays, it is <span class="hiddenspellerror">possiblle</span> for people to buy the same products in all over the world so that it seemed like every countries have a lot of things in common. Some people believe that it is has some disadvantages, however I convinced that it is a positive development. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Lucida Sans Unicode", sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">It <span class="hiddengrammarerror">can be</span> clearly seen that if people can buy the stuff from anywhere in the world, the world economy will develop <span class="hiddenspellerror">significantly</span>. Due to <span class="hiddengrammarerror">the revolution of</span> internet connect people in the world together and make it easier for people to do online shopping, it means we can buy stuff from another countries without travelling and a person who live in <span class="hiddenspellerror">foreign</span> can do the same thing. As a result, there are more international branches appear in a countries and <span class="hiddensuggestion">contribute</span> to raise of economy because every <span class="hiddenspellerror">companies</span> can extend their markets and introduce their products to many kinds of people not only in national residents but also international residents. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Lucida Sans Unicode", sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">Another strong reason is tourists or migrant workers may find it more comfortable when they come to a stranger country. Those people will find many similar things in <span class="hiddenspellerror">comparison</span> with their countries <span class="hiddensuggestion">in order to</span> start a new life or have a better trip such as some products from their hometown will make them more <span class="hiddenspellerror">convinient</span> in daily life. Moreover, if people can see the same thing in a country that they used to have in their local area, they <span class="hiddenspellerror">will</span> have motivated to move to that country to work or book a tour for their vacation. This benefit lead to the sharp development of tourism and labour market in the world. </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Lucida Sans Unicode", sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">In conclusion, even have some drawbacks, it is impossible to deny the merits of this development and <span class="hiddengrammarerror">i</span> strongly recommend that we need to find some effective solutions to make this trend be popular in every countries while their tradition culture or local products have <span class="hiddengrammarerror">to be</span> protect. </span></p>
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- the table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 summarise the information by reporting main features and making comparison where relavent
- Some people think that all the university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in future, such as science and technology. Discuss both views and give our opinion ? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3480.0 1615.20841683 215% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 429.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 8.11188811189 5.12529762239 158% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 8.83553819129 2.80592935109 315% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463869463869 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 953.1 506.74238477 188% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.2 1.60771543086 137% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.2975951904 207% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 200.238382934 49.4020404114 405% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 348.0 106.682146367 326% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.9 20.7667163134 207% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0860582270543 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066929725256 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313908786636 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860582270543 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 38.2 13.0946893788 292% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -21.91 50.2224549098 -44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 17.1 7.44779559118 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 26.8 11.3001002004 237% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 30.65 12.4159519038 247% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 25.5 9.78957915832 260% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.1190380762 186% => OK
text_standard: 31.0 10.7795591182 288% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.