Some people prefer to live in small family units, while others think it is better to live in large family groups. Discuss both of views and give your opinion.
People have different views about which types of family structure individuals would like to live in. While there are some benefits of living in extended families, I would argue that it is better for people to live in nuclear families.
On the one hand, large family groups have several advantages. Firstly, people in various age groups live together in extended families. For example, in Northern Vietnam, senior citizens usually live with their children and offspring. This could positively affect relationships between the old and the young, which might narrow generation gap and make family more united. Secondly, because of a great number of family members in large families, they might not feel lonely and could have someone to spend time with. For instance, children could have sports activities together. This would help strengthen family bonds.
On the other hand, there are some reasons why people should live in small family units. First, due to the small number of people in nuclear families, people have more private spaces in their houses. Therefore, they could have freedom to do what they want without disturbing other members. For example, young individuals prefer listening to loud and ear-splitting music while the elderly are keen on soft and chilling music. Additionally, because small families just have one or two children, parents might have more time to take care of their children. For instance, parents need to look after adolescents who are immature to prevent them from making impulsive decisions that result in regrettable consequences. This could help them to strengthen their relationships.
In conclusion, while large family groups can have several advantages, I believe that living in small family units is a better option.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-03 | Gowridevaraj | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | anhvu010197@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-30 | tr2512 | 60 | view |
| 2019-04-14 | lanhhoang | 61 | view |
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 63
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 16
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 61
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the 82
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32974910394 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58549921824 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5189381851 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4705882353 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314993453927 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110423350816 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107613017638 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240573413208 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652573178835 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.