A controversy is often raised about the ways to improve the quality of education. Some groups of people hold the view that universities should spend money on labs and libraries. However, some others hold a different view and fell that spending these money to increase professor's wages would bring better results. From my vantage point, I concur with the latter groups for different reasons that I address in my essay.
The first exquisite reason to be mentioned is that paying more money to professors make them more productive. Money provides a motive for professors to work harder. Without enough money professors can hardly make a living which makes them demotivated, helpless, and frustrated. This would ultimately leads to a decline in the level of education. A vivid example which illustrate my view point is the quality or education I received when I was studying at my university. Because of the high wages professors earn, the quality of education was of uppermost standards.
However, there are other benefits of increasing professors wages. No one person, including universities has all the answers, especially in today's complex teaching environment, but the one thing that everybody agrees on is that paying more wages to professors encourages them to spend more time with students. Thus, Instead of spend significant amount of time on research, professors can allocate more time to teach students. In other words students will be the winners in the equation
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle reason. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible results of the a study that was published in the American education Journal which showed that universities paying higher professor's wages have better better rankings among the top five hundred universities. This study was conducted on 120 universities inorder to prevent any bias
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that professors who earn more money are more productive and not only are they capable of delivering better quality education, but also can give more time to their students.
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 80
- TPO 24 Integrated TOEFL Writing 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A good leader should spend more time listening to other people's ideas than taking his or her own ideas. 81
- learning from reading is more educational than learning from watching television programs 80
- using vessels as electric batteries in ancient times 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...a different view and fell that spending these money to increase professors wages would brin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
..., and frustrated. This would ultimately leads to a decline in the level of education....
^^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...hy, refreshing, intelligible results of the a study that was published in the America...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: better
...ies paying higher professors wages have better better rankings among the top five hundred uni...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27401129944 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89186766508 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533898305085 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.6328035338 48.9658058833 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.823529412 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76470588235 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154231674388 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534643290729 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373638668859 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882188759437 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03875926621 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.