Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more like to get a sastisfying career than those who frequently change jobs. TO what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is no doubt that there are a wide range of opportunity in career that young people should contemplate in the modern days thanks to the expansion of job market. This circumstance brings about an argument in favour of an idea that people who stick into a job at the beginning seems to be more sastisfied compared to the one who often modified their job. However, I strongly take issue with this point of view and buy into an idea that each of them has its own advantages.
On the one hand, there are numerous benefits associated with people who consistently pursue a specific job. One of the most obvious advantages is that this trend results in a decent life with persistent income which can alleviate the financial burden for indigent family and especially necessary for adults in marriage. In contrast, the interval between interviews can give rise to anxiety and nerve due to the time waiting for result and living without monthly salary. Sticking with a company for a long period is a crucial means to experience a dramatic increase in income or even climb up the career ladder. A fine example for this situation is that it is a norm that most of managers witnessed a long term working at a company since there will be a full understanding of work and methods to promote in that industry.
On the other hand, job-hoppers also brings about positive effects, especially in young generation which appropriated to vibrant and challenging life style. Fist of all, working for variety of companies help teenagers to experience a diversity in working environment and seize an opportunity to absorb new knowledge. Needless to say, frequent modification will play an important role in broadening the horizon and following up-to-date trend of market, hence, the young can accumulate and acquire useful skills. The more job people try, the more co-workers they have and then they can expand their relationship which will necessary in the future. Without changing job, people by no means can find what jobs they most suitable with and there are also chances for job-hoppers to earn a living with surplus income.
In conclusion, no matter what type of doing a job people are in, there are also pros and cons which provide with useful information and wider relationship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-25 | Ngoc Nguyen | 73 | view |
- In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food that can be grown in their local area. As a result, much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages. 78
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional culture are incompatible. To what extentdo you agree or disagree with this view 84
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional culture are incompatible. To what extentdo you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Scientist say that in the future humanity will speak the same language . Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
- In the developed world, average Life expectancy is increasing.What problem will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 671, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the managers') or simply say ''most managers''.
Suggestion: most of the managers; most managers
...his situation is that it is a norm that most of managers witnessed a long term working at a comp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, then, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8961038961 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71767016983 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.4436582317 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.642857143 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171535105755 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613040694405 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065123219371 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115285442827 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418231905356 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.