While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.
It is often argued that the human resources department should look for interpersonal skills rather than the level of education of an employee’s when hiring. This essay agrees that personality is more important than education. Firstly, this essay will discuss that, how personal quality will have an impact of the company’s growth and secondly, it will also discuss that how the personality of an employee will help the team to be successful.
The company’s growth is always tied up with the employees of the organization, so selecting a person with good interpersonal skills is imperative. The attitude of the employee towards the work, when there is a critical situation and, communication with other team members which is directly proportional to the growth of the company, has given the paramount priority than education. It has been seen in an increasing number of people been recruited nowadays in many multinational companies are from secondary education with developed personality and interpersonal communication skills.
A good employee always works for the betterment of the team. Certifications cannot lead a team, a good leader can. Leadership qualities and the mindset towards the team will make an individual a right choice than the employee who has a Ph.D. on that subject and not sure about what he is doing. Jack ma is a great example for this scenario, after establishing Alibaba, he faced significant challenges within the team, but he as a leader, resolved each and every problem and lead the organization towards one of the most successful companies around the world.
In conclusion, companies should give more importance to the people who have a good personality and not the certifications because; these qualities support the company’s growth and play a vital role in being a success in the market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | elanglue | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Kanchan Sagar | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | jakirph365 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | noora.qureshi | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Android | 73 | view |
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? 56
- While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and include relevant examples. 67
- Some people think that it s best to encourage children to leave family home as soon as possible Others believe children should stay at their family home for as long as they like Discuss both views and give your own opinion 75
- While recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualifications and experience To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and include relevant examples 52
- Many people support use of animals for testing medicines for humans. Others believe it isn’t appropriate to use animals for such experiments. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
It is often argued that the human resources department should look for interpersona...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29931972789 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17803588301 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540816326531 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0939469726 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.636363636 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0908448603844 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425026341673 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455985501502 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601606219282 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305924213498 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.