Shares of expenditures for selected categories, United States, Canada, United Kingdom and Japan, 2009.
The figure elucidate the expenditure’s shares for several categories in United States, Canada, United Kingdom and Japan in 2009. At first glance, it is evident that comparing to other sectors, housing had a higher number of shares of expenditures instead of others.
To begin with, housing approximately had the same percentages for all nations in 2009, between at just above 25% and just over 20%. Nevertheless, food faced a difference scheme, over all, only Japan that succeeded to achieve at well across two-tenths, and other states roughly in between 20% and just under fifteen in hundred. However, In 2009, all states had the percentage of transportation aspect, which constituted approximately in between two in ten and one in ten.
In contrast, health care and clothing witnessed a small number of expenditures in 4 countries. It is able to be seen that in health care, only United States that is able to finish at well beyond 10% and other nations are lower rather than United States, which accounted for just less than one-tenths. On the other hand, the number of shares of expenditures of Canada and United Kingdom, which was just above 10%, is higher than United States and Japan, which made up at just below 10%.
- The graph below shows the purchasing of petrol by people from the United States and United Kingdom according to their salaries. 11
- Bar Chart : Percentage Participate of men in senior development position. 84
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and more and more countries open their door and with more and more tourists.Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages? 67
- The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016. 61
- Writing Task 2 (an essay)Some practical skills such as money management should be taught in high school. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and real life examples. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'elucidates'.
Suggestion: elucidates
The figure elucidate the expenditure's shares for sever...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...n between 20% and just under fifteen in hundred. However, In 2009, all states had the p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ast, health care and clothing witnessed a small number of expenditures in 4 countries. It is able...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, well, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83501795374 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538834951456 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.528157847 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332618364704 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165679285414 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.196495152009 0.0843802449381 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270490345478 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171599006069 0.0819641961636 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.