The bar chart show the number of enrolments for several institution.
The bar chart elucidates the percentage of various facilities in the city which was divide into two gender, males and females. At first glance, it is evident that the percentage of women in nursery and primary school had the most enormous number of applicants.
To begin with, nursery and primary school witnessed the same pattern in which the percentage of enrolment for females, which are roughly at well beyond 80 in 100, is extremely higher rather than males, which are approximately at well beneath 20%. In contrast, the number of enrolment in university for males are approximately double times instead of females.
In accordance with the other three aspects, there was a few ranges in the number of women and men for college and private training institute, the ranges of both of it were roughly at 10% for secondary school, where females are higher than males, and 10% for private training institute, in which males are higher than females. Moreover, the percentage of enrolments for college were the same for both genders, it was at a half for each gender.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- the line graph : channel one news viewing figures. 78
- Housing and accommodation has become a major problem in many countries around the world.- What are some of the main factors that have contributed to this problem?- What can be done to help reducing the number of homeless people? 78
- The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016. 67
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist information office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- People live longer today ,and therefore they should work longer? to what extent do you agree or disagree?? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60916594213 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.906152767 43.030603864 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.5 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204538041875 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115640048814 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554396529775 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136186624159 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232087218176 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.