The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned two pie charts show the rate of students at British university in England who can speak other language other than English in two different years 2000 and 2010.
Overall, the percentage of students who can speak Spanish language was the most in both the years. In contrast, German language became the least in 2000 and 2010.
In 2000, students who can speak Spanish language accounted 30% while students with no other language other than English language accounts 20%. Moreover, the students who could speak another language and French language are covered 15%. Even though, students who can speak two other language and German language accounts for 10%.
After 10 years, it is clear that there is a slight increase of 5% in the rate of students who can speak Spanish language, another language and two other language. Also we can see that 10% decrease in no other language. There is no change in German language throughout the ten years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- The graph below show the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of freedonia. 74
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nother language and two other language. Also we can see that 10% decrease in no othe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96894409938 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32886954282 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484472049689 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7056114293 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8888888889 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30828648404 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153890597583 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979026636338 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225569895579 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100377804948 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.64 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.