More and more people buy a wide range of household goods like television, microwave oven and rice cooker. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
Nowadays, more and more householders consume variety of household goods like television, microwave oven and rice cooker. In my opinion, this is an advanced movement in modern life, not only benefit for consumers in general, but also making great profits for business in particular.
First, from user perspective, electrical equipment such as microwave oven and rice cooker significantly assist consumers to perform their daily tasks faster and more convenience. So that, they can spend more time with their family to build profound connection within family members, which is more important than wasting time in kitchen for unnecessary activities due to old and inconvenience equipment. Besides that, due to the fast past of life, people are fully occupied by works and tend to eat fast and unhealthy meals like fast foods to save time. Microwave oven and rice cooker is the eminent solution for this issue because people now able to straightforward cook and enjoy delicious meals at home without suffering long and hard cooking process.
Second, from enterprise perspective, developing household goods like television, microwave oven and rice cooker has established a potential and profitable market. Thanks to enormous demand of those household goods, more factories have been opened and operated, resulted in tackling unemployment problem and encouraging development of relative industries like electric, semi-conductor, and other material productions. Furthermore, good business will contribute more taxed money which can use to enhance the quality of life by building more hospitals, school, infrastructure and to support citizens around.
In conclusion, the development of using household goods has notable contribution in modern life, benefit for both consumers and manufactures as mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-09 | Thai Vu | 75 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | Spring2019 | 73 | view |
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments' expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities can be solved by moving large companies,factories and their employees to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water 73
- Nowadays people always throw old things away, what causes this problem? What effects does the phenomenon lead to? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
- Economic growth in in recent years made some people in both developed countries anddeveloping countries richer. However, research showing that while people in developingcountries are happier, people in developed countries seems no happier than before. Why 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7037037037 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02049696581 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637037037037 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.4823244873 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.0 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364211687109 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154773116429 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132897238687 0.0667982634062 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218005802047 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864892202264 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.