The table and chart below show the time spent at leisure and household activities in Britain.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table and bar graph illustrate the time spent on free-time activities and household activities in Britain.
Overall, it is clear from both table and bar graph that, men has spent more time on leisure activities where the majority of time on household activities spent more by women.
According to the table that, men has spent 137 minutes on TV, video, and on radio and 15 minutes on sport where women spent less time on this kind of activities. Females spent 118 minutes on TV, video, and on radio which fall slightly compared with men where only 11 minutes spent on sport. In reading activities, both men and women spent about equal time. Men spent 18 minutes and women spent 19 minutes per day.
The bar chart beholds the time spent on household activities. Both men and women spent the greatest number of time on cooking and washing. Men spent only around 30 minutes but women escalate sharply and do this activity for around about 75 minutes. Women also spent more time on shopping and clothes washing and ironing than men. They spent just about 35 minutes on shopping and 30 minutes on clothes washing and ironing. Interestingly, activities of repair, men spent more time just under 30 minutes but women spent only half of minutes than of men.
- Some fast food restaurants and supermarkets support the school in order to promote their products. Is it positive or negative development for school and students? 73
- The graph below shows the number of magazines sold in 5 different countries in 2005 and 2015 A prediction for 2025 is also given 65
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extend do you agree or disagree wi 61
- Some people believe that students in schools learn better when they study in groups Others say school students learn better when they study on their own Discuss both views and give your own opinion 71
- Some people think subjects taught in school are a waste of time, while others disagree and believe that this type of education is useful for students. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 84
Comments
Thanks for this helpful…
Thanks for this helpful information in the post. I have received a lot of useful information friday night funkin
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76818181818 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29323024546 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431818181818 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2740414587 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4166666667 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214177260649 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119191469226 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804582250505 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199679746256 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730767597661 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.