The line graph shows the consumption of energy in the USA by a 2008 report from 1980 to 2030.
Overall, the amount of petrol and oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear, solar/wind is expected to increase, the opposite is true for hydro power. Moreover, it can be seen that from history to projections, petrol and gas are consumed the most, on the other hand, hydro power had the lowest consumption.
In 1980, petrol and gas started at highest point (35 million) and had fluctuation (up to nearly 40 million in 2005). It is set to increase over the period (over 45 million in 2030). Although coal is used nearly 5 million less than natural (natural 20 million and coal 15 million), but after 50 years of fluctuation, by 2030, coal (30 million) is expected to be used 5 million more than natural gas (25 million). Atomic and solar energy had the same amount of consumption in 1980, but solar energy tended to increase steadily until 2030 from nearly 5 to over 5 million. At the same time, solar/wind energy had slightly fluctuation in the first twenty years and will rise slightly to 2030 (about 5 million).
On the contrary, in 1980 it was estimated that about 5 million hydro power was consumed in the US but this figure is likely to decrease to 3 million in the near future.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 56
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 64
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050 Units are given in percentages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: natural
...coal is used nearly 5 million less than natural natural 20 million and coal 15 million, but aft...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, moreover, so, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55263157895 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45394638854 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504385964912 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7605719149 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1351998927 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871248366647 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118304800588 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131831623844 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146233323032 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.