Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people say that it is too late to do something while others think that actions can be taken to improve the situation. Discuss both sides of the view and give your opinion.
The god has divided plethora of mesmerize things with humans. Where humans are destroyed them for satisfying their selfish purpose. The recent few decades are the witness of the industrial sector. A mid these developments, there is one burning debate that has occurred between two group of people about taking steps for combat the harsh environmental condition. However according to other, possible steps can be taken to bring about changes. In this essay, i will try to throw light upon two contradicting view about damaging the creatures by human activities. In addition, i will also posit my perspective about it.
To commence with, there are plenteous reasons to shore those people who are in favor of doing nothing for improving the situation which has caused by human activities. The first and foremost reason is that population is booming over the globe nowadays. To justify that, as increasing the population they want to feed for their livelihood. Because food is vital factor for human over the globe. So, they killed the animals for feeding as well as some people do not have alter option for feeding. The another predominant reason is that shelter. To be precise that people are moving from countryside to urban area for betterment of their future which can lead to vanish the forest for improving the landfill sites of urban area. Last but not the least, the third reason is that all dwellers want fulfilled their need like clothes. some masses hunt the plants and animals to produce the up to date and seasonable clothes.
On the other side of the spectrum, there are numerous possible steps that can be taken to solve out the mentioned problem. Firstly, despite of having other alternative organic food option, humans kill the animal for the feed that leads to disrupt the ecological cycle. But humans have no right to kill livestock for food. Secondly, skyscraper building should be the better option to mitigate the burden on forestation. As population is increasing, they want more space on land to build up the infrastructure. Hence, this is a better way to eliminate the deforestation problem. Furthermore, people should use the renewable sources to cut off the pollution that affect adversely on livestock and plantation.
Agglomerating all the points, I elaborated above it can be concluded that pros of conservation the animals and plants outweigh the cons of doing nothing to protect them. That is why I support these people who are in favor of doing something to prevent the living creatures because it is a more fruitful in my opinion.
- The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining English language teacher training qualifications in 2007 8 and 2008 9 and the proportion of male qualifiers 57
- Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 73
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that it is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. 78
- Nowadays most people choose to throw away broken things instead of repairing them, and replace them with new ones. Why is this happening? What problems may it lead to? 61
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What cangovernments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 458, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... to bring about changes. In this essay, i will try to throw light upon two contra...
^
Line 1, column 575, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tures by human activities. In addition, i will also posit my perspective about it...
^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'altered'.
Suggestion: altered
...ding as well as some people do not have alter option for feeding. The another predomi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 829, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...want fulfilled their need like clothes. some masses hunt the plants and animals to p...
^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts outweigh the cons of doing nothing to protect them. That is why I support thes...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, well, in addition, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00700934579 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6881579819 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546728971963 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6388976228 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.72 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.12 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.32 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17719586681 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440264657999 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044849265976 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108756581815 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020269142809 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.