Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people say that it is too late to do something while others think that actions can be taken to improve the situation. Discuss both sides of the view and give your opinio

All other living things play an imperative role as humankind in this enormous sphere. Morbid repercussions on the living organisms like trees, herbs and creatures by mankind activities are inevitable. A view of hoi polloi lies on the unaffected side of action, whereas other contend and acquiesce impactful change of appropriate actions.

Depletion of the forest area has been seen to built different infrastructure ranging from roads for transportation to new buildings. This directly disturbed wildlife. This has been done in order to connect various cities with fast tracks for copious purposes. Ergo, which already has been created ere has no eloquent view by removing it or erect a new one. Moreover, pollution is paramount factor for the migration of animals. For instance, wild animals are leaving their habitat due to noise and air pollution. Nil vehicle movement could be inconvenient and inappropriate in this modern era.

On the other side, banning deforestation act and prohibition on entering of a human being in forest area would bring positive change. Firstly, create an alternate and convenient way to approach different areas without disturbing trees and animals' habitat could one of the effective measures. Lastly, attraction towards extint animals could bring people and researchers to them. Consequently, numerous mankind acts create an unpleasant situation for endangered plants and animals. Restriction or prohibition in those areas also leads to fraction change.

To conclude, certainly some preceded work which already developed would not be restored the loss regarding the environment. But, I believe that there are many green sides of actions that bring positive impacts.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emoving it or erect a new one. Moreover, pollution is paramount factor for the mi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54022988506 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90147365075 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681992337165 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.618216596 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.0588235294 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3529411765 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12462031423 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349594333505 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362091124512 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751156993067 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291280307223 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.26 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.