Some people believe that it is good to share as much as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or valuable to be shared freely.
The majority of people think that information sharing in science, business, and theories play an important role in our modern world, while others say that it is not necessary to publish know-how to community. From my perspective, I agree with the point of view that we should not reveal many precious information in a public way, which can have multiple negative impacts on the development of society and economy.
On the one hand, it is needless to say that this information delivered in the right way will have many merits. Firstly, it not only broadens citizens’ horizons but also raise their awareness in social contribution. For example, when we know about the invention of sophisticated digital camera, we can request to install this equipment with the traffic light system that can help to observe traffic congestion in urban cities. Moreover, this sharing can boost economy growth in many industries. With the advancement of technology and cutting-edge knowledge about it, we can apply them to business models and create more positive effects. It gives us the opportunities to improve the productivity, make more profits and systematize the manufacturing.
On the other hand, I must admit that there is some information related to business credentials and patents that should be concealed in front of the public for many reasons. It can be competitive benefits of nations or entrepreneurs that is tough to share with others. If these know-hows are public, it can give the competitors chance to defeat them, thereby, it should keep in secret as their key advantages. In addition to this, these materials are complicated and require a certain levels to understand them; therefore, they are only for professionals and experts in some fields. We can realize that this sharing cannot bring any value to society and it is not vital to share with the crowd.
In conclusion, I still believe that we should not share precious information to the media, especially in business, science. It can damage the nation competition or organization benefits in many aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | Moustafa Noufale | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | gudupatnaik1996 | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | Mohammadjavad | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-12 | mytran234 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | Mishika sugandhi | 61 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- water use in many purposes in 6 countries 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much precious information', 'a good deal of precious information'.
Suggestion: much precious information; a good deal of precious information
...point of view that we should not reveal many precious information in a public way, which can have multipl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a public way" with adverb for "public"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ld not reveal many precious information in a public way, which can have multiple negative impac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18694362018 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95942559644 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572700296736 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 5.43587174349 294% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2322402226 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.533333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17012528586 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591306842042 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680294855058 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117528251492 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522292108117 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.