The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
» Write at least 150 words.
The line graph given illustrates the data about the percentage of families reusing in three countries, namely the UK, France, Germany over the course 10 years from 2005 to 2015.
Overall, the rates of wasting houses in France saw a decline while there was an upward trend in the other figures over the period.
In 2005, France stood at first in recycling in the local houses, with 50%, while the UK and Germany were lower, about 25% and around 20% respectively.
Over 10 years, the number of France witnessed a gradual fall to the lowest point after going up significantly, about 30% in 2013 and around 40% in 2015. By contrast, the proportion of reprocessing homes in the UK remained stable in 2009 after it grew sharply in 2007, about 40%. Meanwhile, there was a dramatic increase in the rate of this in Germany between 2005 and 2009, about 35%. In 2015, there was a similar trend in both the UK and Germany. These numbers for UK and Germany boomed rapidly, 60% and 55% respectively. At this point, the figure for the UK ranked the highest in the number of recycling the local homes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | SNEHA S.R | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | akva | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | Thu Phung | 78 | view |
- THE CHART BELOW SHOWS THE AMOUNT OF MONEY PER WEEK SPENT ON FAST FOODS IN BRITAIN.THE GRAPH SHOWS THE TRENDS IN CONSUMPTION OF FAST FOODS.WRITE A REPORT FOR A UNIVERSITY LECTURER DESCRIBING THE INFORMATION SHOWN BELOW 84
- THE GRAPH BELOW SHOWS IN PERCENTAGE TERMS THE CHANGING PATTERNS OF DOMESTIC ACCESS TO MODERN TECHNOLOGY IN HOMES IN THE UK 83
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 86
- the table below describe victim by age group offense categories in Venezuela 1999 56
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62371134021 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44230372527 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.652645219 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106358548236 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461924824764 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373679873022 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682879393227 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314223645222 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.