Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
The author claims that it is impossible for anyone to be regarded as hero due to the nowadays media scrutiny would diminish people's reputation. While full aspect exposure of the people by media usually makes people know the dark sides of people, the more information about people the public gain from the media enable them to fully evaluate the person who has heroic characteristic. therefore, I am partially agree with the author's claim and reason.
The author's claim that current society would not treat the living person as media provides closer scrutiny than ever before. Indeed, nowadays media can quickly response to the event. And people can easily be scrutinzed. Since nobody is perfect, the drawbacks of people can easily be augemented by meida which leads public to believe that the person has something unacceptable rather than evaluating the people comprehensively. However, for the person who has passed away, media may not be interested in their scandals to grab eyeball and scholars may sometimes to provide reasonably assessment of the person. therefore, it is muck more likely for public to accept the person who is not living as hero.
Besides, the media usually sentimentionlise the scandals to gain public attention or to serve their own purpose. For example, as the trade war between China and United States, Chinese media usually promugate president trump as a selffish , discredit person who ignores the common interest of both country people and insistently implement his "America first" policy to achieve his own goal. Whether president trump's policy is a self-serving plan, the unfriendly media content has definitely established him as a unruly person. In short, media usually publish article to serve their own purpose instead of disinterest attitude.
However, even the media can easily draw public's attention from people's drawbacks, its unprecedented promalgate power also accelerates public's acceptation of people as hero. To illustrate, one does not need to look further than the famous basketball yaoming. As the first famous basketball player in NBA, yaoming does not be widely accepted by American people. but after several years' effort and media's promalugate, Yao has become a basketball star in NBA.
In conclusion, media scrutiny is a double sides sword. The closer scrutiny may augment people's drawbacks, but it also possible to accept living people as hero.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Morienta | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Nico Lingga | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | shivamchug | 54 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished. 83
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based o 55
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach. Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posi 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...e person who has heroic characteristic. therefore, I am partially agree with the authors ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...aracteristic. therefore, I am partially agree with the authors claim and reason. The...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...de reasonably assessment of the person. therefore, it is muck more likely for public to a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... promugate president trump as a selffish , discredit person who ignores the common...
^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ntent has definitely established him as a unruly person. In short, media usually ...
^
Line 4, column 360, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... be widely accepted by American people. but after several years effort and medias p...
^^^
Line 4, column 378, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...d by American people. but after several years effort and medias promalugate, Yao has ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, look, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2032.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78137141945 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543307086614 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.913896373 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.947368421 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0526315789 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211263890555 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07454458321 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631382584323 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129329932396 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060144038824 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.