The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the annual expenditure of a British school in terms of insurance, teacher’s salaries, furniture and equipment, resources and other workers’ salaries at three different points in time: 1981, 1991 and 2001.
It is clear that the amount of money paid for teachers accounted for almost half of the school spending while the spending on insurance was reported the least in each year.
In 1981, about 40% of the school’s budget was recorded as teachers’ salaries. This figure increased by 10% in 1991 and then dropped to 45% in 2001. Similarly, the proportion of salaries of non-teacher workers decreased steadily from 28% of the total expenses in 1981 to 15% in 2001.
Insurance made up the least in the school’s expenditure, at 2% in 1981 but gradually increased in 2001, reaching 8% of the total spending. Finally, the percentage of spending on resources and furniture/equipment varied significantly in each year. The figure for furniture/equipment was about 15% in 1981 and rose to 23% in 2001 after falling by 10% in 1991. The spending on resources such as books increased by 5%, from 15% in 1981 to 20% in 1991 but then dropped by roughly 10% in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Pamela K | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | Abimbola1 | 78 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment. 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 56
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, similarly, so, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.055 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24419096232 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9775360027 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202666001189 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881226219125 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400885977683 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130609185082 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344826913143 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.